02953nas a2200205 4500000000100000008004100001653002300042653002200065653002000087653001400107100002300121700001600144700002000160700002400180245014700204856008100351300001000432490000700442520229800449 2015 d10aNon-dermatologists10aLeprosy diagnosis10aSlit-skin smear10aKnowledge1 aPattanaprichakul P1 aChayangsu O1 aLertrujiwanit K1 aChairatchaneeboon M00aAssessment of Non-Dermatologists’ Knowledge Regarding Clinical Diagnosis of Leprosy and Practice in Slit-Skin Smear as a Basic Investigation uhttp://www.sirirajmedj.com/ojs/index.php/sirirajmedj/article/viewFile/83/107 a66-710 v673 a
Background: Leprosy is diagnosed based on cardinal signs. According to this, patients with one or more of the following characteristic symptoms are suspected leprosy: hypo-pigmented or reddened skin lesion(s) with loss of sensation and/or involvement of the peripheral nerves and positive slit-skin smear for acid-fast bacilli. Physicians who are not engaged in Leprosy work and no experience may fail to diagnosis it.
Objective: To evaluate the diagnosed ability of leprosy by identification of basic investigation and find related factors to correct diagnosis in general practitioners and non-dermatological specialists who attended annual short-course training in dermatology.
Methods: During the year 2011-2012, 122 participants who attended in short-course training in dermatology for general practitioners was annually conducted by the Dermatological Society of Thailand were evaluated by pre-test answer sheets were retrospectively reviewed. These tests were composed of viewing a clinical picture of leprosy with a brief patient’s history. Participants were asked to answer three questions for a diagnosis, physical examinations and further investigations respectively.
Results: One hundred and seven physicians voluntarily turned in their answer sheets. Most physicians were female (75.7%). About half of the participants were aged between 26 to 30 years. Eighty-three of them (77.6%) were general practitioners and the rest (22.4%) were non-dermatologist specialists. Most of them were able to make a diagnosis of leprosy (60.7%) but only 15 (23.1%) participants could describe physical examinations completely. Only 20 (30.8%) participants documented a slit-skin smear for an appropriate investigation.
Conclusion: Most of general practitioners and non-dermatologist specialists are able to diagnose leprosy. However most of them could not perform physical examinations completely and also lack of knowledge for a slit-skin smear which is a basic diagnostic tool for making a diagnosis of leprosy.