02963nas a2200265 4500000000100000008004100001653001200042653001100054653001000065100001700075700001300092700001500105700001100120700001100131700001400142700001300156700001600169700001500185245013400200856009800334300001300432490000700445520223100452022001402683 2018 d10aleprosy10aStigma10aNepal1 aMarahatta SB1 aAmatya R1 aAdhikari S1 aGiri D1 aLama S1 aKaehler N1 aRijal KR1 aMarahatta S1 aAdhikari B00aPerceived stigma of leprosy among community members and health care providers in Lalitpur district of Nepal: A qualitative study. uhttps://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0209676&type=printable ae02096760 v133 a

BACKGROUND: Leprosy remains a major stigmatizing condition. Stigma is a dynamic process resulting from the interaction between physical attributes caused by leprosy and the existing stereotypes in a community. Leprosy has pervasive impacts on all areas of life including psychosocial burden to an individual, social interaction, marriage, and employment. These impacts vary and are largely dependent on a particular culture and community. The main objective of this study was to explore the perceived stigma of leprosy amongst community members and health care providers in Lalitpur district of Nepal.

METHODS: A total of six focused group discussions (FGDs) with 43 participants from a community living close to Anandaban Leprosy Hospital and ten semi structured interviews (SSIs) with health care providers were conducted between October and December 2016. An interview guide was used for the FGDs and SSIs. All qualitative data were transcribed and translated into English and were thematically analyzed using Atlas.ti software.

RESULTS: Visible deformities due to leprosy was one of the major contributing factors for stigma. Stigma was further exacerbated by an attitude to conceal the disease due to perceived fear of potential discrimination. While over the years, stigma was felt to be decreasing, various aspects of life were still affected by leprosy stigma including marriage, employment and social interaction. This was largely attributed to leprosy and its consequences, specifically the disability and deformity caused by leprosy.

CONCLUSION: Leprosy was still perceived to be feared and concealed because of potential discrimination, even within the community that was close to a long established leprosy hospital. Various aspects such as marriage, employment and social interaction were still affected by the stigma which was strongly associated with visible deformities. In addition to ongoing rehabilitation and stigma reduction programs, integrating strategies such as community engagement wherein community and leprosy affected person jointly take a role in stigma reduction programs can be helpful.

 a1932-6203