02866nas a2200385 4500000000100000008004100001260001200042653001400054653001300068653000800081653001400089653001400103653001200117653001900129653001700148100001600165700001300181700001400194700001500208700001600223700001300239700001100252700001300263700001100276700001600287700001100303700001700314700001200331245012400343856008000467300000900547490000700556520190300563022001402466 2020 d c01/202010aM. leprae10aRLEP PCR10aWGS10adiagnosis10agenotypes10aleprosy10astrain subtype10atransmission1 aTiĆ³-Coma M1 aAvanzi C1 aVerhard E1 aPierneef L1 avan Hooij A1 aBenjak A1 aRoy JC1 aKhatun M1 aAlam K1 aCorstjens P1 aCole S1 aRichardus JH1 aGeluk A00aGenomic Characterization of Mycobacterium leprae to Explore Transmission Patterns Identifies New Subtype in Bangladesh. uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7308449/pdf/fmicb-11-01220.pdf a12200 v113 a

, the causative agent of leprosy, is an unculturable bacterium with a considerably reduced genome (3.27 Mb) compared to homologues mycobacteria from the same ancestry. In 2001, the genome of was first described and subsequently four genotypes (1-4) and 16 subtypes (A-P) were identified providing means to study global transmission patterns for leprosy. In order to understand the role of asymptomatic carriers we investigated carriage as well as infection in leprosy patients ( = 60) and healthy household contacts (HHC; = 250) from Bangladesh using molecular detection of the bacterial element RLEP in nasal swabs (NS) and slit skin smears (SSS). In parallel, to study genotype distribution in Bangladesh we explored strain diversity by whole genome sequencing (WGS) and Sanger sequencing. In the studied cohort in Bangladesh, DNA was detected in 33.3% of NS and 22.2% of SSS of patients with bacillary index of 0 whilst in HHC 18.0% of NS and 12.3% of SSS were positive. The majority of the strains detected in this study belonged to genotype 1D (55%), followed by 1A (31%). Importantly, WGS allowed the identification of a new genotype, designated 1B-Bangladesh (14%), which clustered separately between the 1A and 1B strains. Moreover, we established that the genotype previously designated 1C, is not an independent subtype but clusters within the 1D genotype. Intraindividual differences were present between the strains obtained including mutations in hypermutated genes, suggesting mixed colonization/infection or in-host evolution. In summary, we observed that is present in asymptomatic contacts of leprosy patients fueling the concept that these individuals contribute to the current intensity of transmission. Our data therefore emphasize the importance of sensitive and specific tools allowing post-exposure prophylaxis targeted at -infected or -colonized individuals.

 a1664-302X