02233nas a2200253 4500000000100000008004100001260001200042653001700054653001200071653002000083653001700103653002700120100001300147700001400160700001500174700001500189700001500204700001500219700001500234700001600249245009100265520160900356022001401965 2020 d c07/202010abacilloscopy10aleprosy10aleprosy relapse10anerve biopsy10aprimary neural leprosy1 aSantos D1 aAntunes D1 aDornelas B1 ada Cunha B1 aOliveira T1 aPereira RC1 aGoulart LR1 aGoulart IMB00aPeripheral nerve biopsy: a tool still needed in the early diagnosis of neural leprosy?3 a

BACKGROUND: The early recognition of neural impairment in leprosy, especially in primary neural forms, represents a challenge in clinical practice and a peripheral nerve biopsy may be required for diagnostic confirmation. This study aims to characterize the epidemiological, clinical, electroneuromyographic, laboratory and histopathological aspects of patients undergoing peripheral nerve biopsy during investigation of primary neural cases in leprosy.

METHODS: A total of 104 patients with peripheral neuropathy who were referred to a national reference centre for leprosy were biopsied from 2014 to 2018. All cases underwent clinical, laboratory, histopathological and electroneuromyographic evaluations.

RESULTS: Of 104 biopsied patients, leprosy was confirmed in 89.4% (93/104). The biopsied nerves were the ulnar (67.8% [63/93]), superficial fibular (21.5% [20/93]), sural (8.6% [8/93]), radial (1.1% [1/93]) and deep fibular (1.1% [1/93]). Twenty-nine percent (27/93) presented histopathological abnormalities and 4.4% (4/93) presented acid-fast bacilli. Nerve and superjacent skin quantitative polymerase chain reaction were positive in 49.5% (46/93) and 24.8% (23/93) of cases, respectively. Patients with multiple mononeuropathy had a higher frequency of histopathological abnormalities (p=0.0077).

CONCLUSIONS: This study reinforces peripheral nerve biopsy's role as an important tool in the investigation of primary neural cases, contributing to the early diagnosis and also reducing diagnostic errors and the need for empirical treatment.

 a1878-3503