02644nas a2200205 4500000000100000008004100001260001200042653001700054653002000071653001200091653002500103653001800128100001500146700001500161700001400176245015500190856008300345520199600428022001402424 2021 d c03/202110aEpidemiology10aHealth services10aleprosy10aMycobacterium leprae10aPublic health1 ade Sousa P1 aSousa ALMD1 aTurchi MD00aReviewing the therapeutic management of leprosy in primary care: demand case series referred to a University Hospital in the Midwest region of Brazil. uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0365059621000519?via%3Dihub3 a

BACKGROUND: Leprosy still represents a negleted public health problem in Brazil. Early and adequate treatment of leprosy, carried out in a primary health network is essential to reduce morbidity and sequelae.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the therapeutic management of leprosy patients referred from primary healthy services to a secondary specialized service.

METHODS: An analytical retrospective study using medical records and the Notifiable Diseases Information System. Patients diagnosed with leprosy, referred to a secondary specialized outpatient clinic, between 2016 and 2017, in Goiás state, were included. The treatment carried out in the primary health services was compared to the Ministry of Health guidelines.

RESULTS: Two-hundred twenty-five leprosy patients were included, of whom 33.3% were referred by leprosy reactions, 27.1% by sequelae, and 10.2% by suspected recurrence or reinfection. Reviewing the therapeutic management, 123 (54.7%) were considered inadequate, 92 (40.9%) adequate, and 10 (4.4%) inconclusive. Of the 200 multibacillary patients, 39.5% had adequate management. In contrast, 12 (85.1%) out of 14 paucibacillary patients had adequate management (χ = 11.43 and p < 0.001). Regarding the leprosy reactions and sequelae management, 59.3% and 19.5% were considered inadequate, respectively. There was no difference between the percentage of adequate or inadequate management when considering the Goiás health macroregions (χ = 7.23; 4 degrees of freedom; p = 0.12).

STUDY LIMITATIONS: Use of recorded data, with incomplete medical records and lack of patient follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrated the equivocal multibacillaryleprosy management conducted in healthy primary care, with an emphasis on leprosy reactions and sequelae. Training and monitoring the medical staff in the primary healthy services could reduce the morbidity and sequelae of leprosy.

 a1806-4841