02325nas a2200361 4500000000100000008004100001260001200042653002400054653001500078653001200093653002100105100002500126700001500151700001700166700001700183700001100200700001200211700001600223700001500239700001200254700001200266700001500278700001800293700001300311700001200324700001400336700001700350700001400367245009000381856007600471520140200547022001401949 2021 d c05/202110aactive case finding10aclustering10aleprosy10aspatial analysis1 aOrtuño-Gutiérrez N1 aMzembaba A1 aRamboarina S1 aAndriamira R1 aBaco A1 aBraet S1 aYounoussa A1 aCauchoix B1 aSalim Z1 aAmidy M1 aGrillone S1 aRasamoelina T1 aCambau E1 aGeluk A1 ade Jong B1 aRichardus JH1 aHasker EC00aExploring clustering of leprosy in the Comoros and Madagascar: a geospatial analysis. uhttps://www.ijidonline.com/action/showPdf?pii=S1201-9712%2821%2900415-X3 a
OBJECTIVES: To identify patterns of spatial clustering of leprosy.
DESIGN: We performed a baseline survey for a trial on post-exposure prophylaxis for leprosy in Comoros and Madagascar. We screened 64 villages, door-to-door, and recorded results of screening, demographic data and geographic coordinates. To identify clusters, we fitted a purely spatial Poisson model using Kulldorff's spatial scan statistic. To assess at the individual level the risk of suffering from leprosy as a function of distance to the nearest known leprosy patient, we used a regular Poisson model.
RESULTS: We identified 455 leprosy patients, 200 (44.0%) belonging to 2,735 households included in a cluster. Thirty-eight percent of leprosy patients versus ten percent of the population live within 25 meters of another leprosy patient. The risk ratios for being diagnosed with leprosy were 7.3 (5.1-10.4), 2.4 (1.7-3.4), 1.8 (1.3-2.5), 1.4 (1.0-2.1) and 1.7 (1.1-2.4) respectively for those living in the same household, at 1-<25 m, at 25-<50 m, at 50-<75 m and at 75-<100 m, compared to those living at ≥100 m.
CONCLUSIONS: We documented significant clustering of leprosy beyond the household-level, though 56% of cases were not part of a cluster. Control measures need to be extended beyond the household and social networks should be further explored.
a1878-3511