Background: Nerve examination in leprosy is subjective. There is a paucity of literature on objective methods to evaluate nerve involvement in Leprosy.
Aims and Objectives: (1) To measure cross‑sectional area (CSA) of nerves and identify echotexural changes in nerves in patients of leprosy by high‑frequency ultrasonography (HFUS). (2) To compare HFUS findings in CSA and echotexture of nerves at baseline and after treatment. (3) To compare clinical grading and HFUS grading of nerves before and after treatment.
Methods: Both newly diagnosed and treated patients of leprosy were included in the study. Nerve examination was done clinically and clinical grading of nerve thickening was done. Then, thickened nerves were subjected to HUFS to examine CSA (CSA) and echotextural changes. Nerves were also graded by HFUS grading. Parameters such as CSA, echotextural changes, and clinical and HFUS grading were compared before and after completion of treatment.
Observations: Sixty‑four leprosy patients were studied. Most of the patients in our study were in the third and fourth decade with a male preponderance and the mean age of presentation is 35.75 years. A total of 154 peripheral nerves were studied in 64 leprosy patients. Borderline tuberculoid leprosy (BTH) was the most common type of leprosy. The ulnar nerve was the most commonly imaged nerve followed by the greater auricular nerve. There was a statistically significant difference in CSA of nerves before and after treatment. Only 7 of 23 patients, who were found to have features of neuritis on USG, were clinically symptomatic. Three patients were diagnosed to have nerve abscesses.
Conclusion: HFUS appears to be an objective, simple method to evaluate nerve involvement in leprosy. It is also useful to diagnose silent neuritis and nerve abscess. Limitations: All the peripheral nerves were not examined in healthy controls and leprosy patients