03314nas a2200349 4500000000100000008004100001260001000042653002400052653001200076653002000088653002300108653001200131100001100143700001300154700001500167700002300182700001400205700001300219700001700232700001400249700001300263700001700276700001500293700001400308700001300322245007900335856006200414300000900476490000600485520244800491022002502939 2024 d bWiley10ahealthcare delivery10aleprosy10aleprosy control10aneglected diseases10aNigeria1 aOke GI1 aNsofor I1 aAbubakar B1 aLucero‐Prisno DE1 aSunday AP1 aDibia EO1 aElebesunu EE1 aOkpokpo O1 aObeta OK1 aBabatunde AO1 aAdeyemi AS1 aAdeoye PA1 aUtaka EN00aExperience of people living with leprosy at leprosy settlements in Nigeria uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/puh2.171 a1-140 v33 a

Background: Although Nigeria achieved the national leprosy elimination target of less than 1/10,000 population in 1998, factors such as culture, behavioural patterns and social determinants, among others, continue to contribute to an increase in leprosy cases and a poor state of living for individuals with leprosy in Nigeria. This study delves into the experiences of individuals residing in leprosy settlements in Nigeria.

Methods: This study employed a community‐based cross‐sectional design, utilizing a concurrent mixed‐methods approach for comprehensive data collection. Questionnaires, focus groups and interviews are conducted simultaneously. The research involves participants from seven leprosy communities across Nigeria's six geopolitical zones and Federal Capital Territory. Qualitative methods, including 14 focus group discussions and 6 key informant interviews, are complemented by quantitative questionnaires, engaging residents, leaders and nongovernmental organization (NGO) representatives. Respondents comprised 35 leprosy patients, 21 family members, 7 community leaders, 7 settlement officers and 2 organizational heads involved in leprosy control.

Results: The results indicate significant access to healthcare (93.7%) and interest in self‐care practices (95.2%), with a considerable proportion (74.6%) receiving free healthcare. Interview data underscore the limited government support, with NGOs and partners assuming a more substantial role. Qualitative insights from persons living with leprosy highlight financial struggles, stigmatization and substandard living conditions in settlements, exacerbated by limited government funding. This reliance on private and NGOs is further compounded by declining funding, hindering individuals’ ability to start businesses and provide self‐care.

Conclusion: This study underscores the pressing need for increased government support, funding and better living conditions for individuals affected by leprosy in Nigeria. It highlights the significance of education, awareness campaigns and human rights promotion to combat stigma and enhance the quality of life for those living with leprosy. Moreover, the study advocates for the reintegration of affected individuals into their communities to foster societal inclusion and well‐being.

 a2769-2450, 2769-2450