TY - JOUR KW - leprosy KW - Primary Health Care KW - Economic cost analysis KW - India AU - Tiwari A AU - Blok DJ AU - Suryawanshi P AU - Raikwar A AU - Arif M AU - Richardus JH AB -
OBJECTIVES: WHO recommends inclusion of post-exposure chemoprophlaxis with single dose rifampicine in national leprosy control programs. The objective was to estimate the cost of leprosy services at primary care level in two different public-health settings.
METHODS: Ingredient-based costing was performed in 8 Primary Health Centers (PHC) purposively selected in the Union Territory of Dadra and Nagar Haveli (DNH) and the Umbergaon block of Valsad district, Gujarat, India. All costs were bootstrapped, and to estimate the variation in total cost under uncertainty, univariate sensitivity analysis was performed.
RESULTS: The mean annual cost of providing leprosy services was USD 29,072 in the DNH PHC (95% CI: 22,125-36,020) and USD 11,082 in Umbergaon (95% CI: 8,334- 13,830). The single largest cost component was human resources: 79% in DNH and 83% in Umbergaon. The unit cost for screening the contact of a leprosy patient was USD 1 in DNH (95% CI: 0.8- 1.2) and USD 0.3 in Umbergaon (95% CI: 0.2- 0.4). In DNH, the unit cost of delivering single dose of rifampicin (SDR) as chemoprophylaxis for contacts was USD 2.9 (95% CI: 2.5- 3.7).
CONCLUSIONS: The setting with an enhanced public-health financing system invests more in leprosy services than a setting with fewer financial resources. In terms of leprosy visits, the enhanced public-health system is hardly more expensive than the non-enhanced public-health system. The unit cost of contact screening is not high, favoring its sustainability in the program. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
BT - Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH C1 -http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30444947?dopt=Abstract
DO - 10.1111/tmi.13182 J2 - Trop. Med. Int. Health LA - eng N2 -OBJECTIVES: WHO recommends inclusion of post-exposure chemoprophlaxis with single dose rifampicine in national leprosy control programs. The objective was to estimate the cost of leprosy services at primary care level in two different public-health settings.
METHODS: Ingredient-based costing was performed in 8 Primary Health Centers (PHC) purposively selected in the Union Territory of Dadra and Nagar Haveli (DNH) and the Umbergaon block of Valsad district, Gujarat, India. All costs were bootstrapped, and to estimate the variation in total cost under uncertainty, univariate sensitivity analysis was performed.
RESULTS: The mean annual cost of providing leprosy services was USD 29,072 in the DNH PHC (95% CI: 22,125-36,020) and USD 11,082 in Umbergaon (95% CI: 8,334- 13,830). The single largest cost component was human resources: 79% in DNH and 83% in Umbergaon. The unit cost for screening the contact of a leprosy patient was USD 1 in DNH (95% CI: 0.8- 1.2) and USD 0.3 in Umbergaon (95% CI: 0.2- 0.4). In DNH, the unit cost of delivering single dose of rifampicin (SDR) as chemoprophylaxis for contacts was USD 2.9 (95% CI: 2.5- 3.7).
CONCLUSIONS: The setting with an enhanced public-health financing system invests more in leprosy services than a setting with fewer financial resources. In terms of leprosy visits, the enhanced public-health system is hardly more expensive than the non-enhanced public-health system. The unit cost of contact screening is not high, favoring its sustainability in the program. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
PY - 2018 T2 - Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH TI - Leprosy services in primary health care in India: comparative economic cost analysis of two public-health settings. UR - https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/tmi.13182 SN - 1365-3156 ER -